![]() |
![]() |
|
"Waiting Time" Statute in Labor Code Requires that Employee be "Discharged" California wage and
hour laws require a so-called "waiting time" penalty for the untimely
payment of wages to a terminating employee. An appellate court has ruled
that these penalties are not available where the employment came to an
end by agreement. The case involved a model hired for a single day whose
wages were paid months after the employment ended. The employee sued for
"waiting time penalties", but the court rued the penalty is not available
unless the employee was actually discharged. Age Comment Keeps Case of Alive A federal court in Illinois ruled that a supervisor's comment to a 59 year-old employee that he was "undesirable in the business world because of his age" just five months before the employee was fired and replaced by a 22 year-old was enough evidence of an illegal motive to send the case to a jury trial. [ back to top ] |
|
About our Firm | Our Services | Attorney Directory | Management Memos BRG&S Publications | Published Articles | BRG&S In the News | Seminars Visitor Comments | Home Page |
| Practice
limited to labor and employment law on behalf of management and related
litigation. Ballard Rosenberg Golper & Savitt, LLP has prepared this site
to enable you to learn more about our firm and the services it provides.
These materials do not, and are not intended to, constitute legal advice.
The information we make available at this site does not create an attorney-client
relationship, nor does it substitute for obtaining legal advice. ©2003 Ballard Rosenberg Golper & Savitt, LLP. No part of this site may be reproduced without permission. For technical support, contact webmaster. Site Design by Kricos Internet Design. |