|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
|
U.S. Supreme Court
Rules: (1) Use of the Word "Boy" Might Be Evidence of Racial Bias under
Some Circumstances, Even If No Racial Modifier Is Used; and (2) Disparity
in Candidates' Qualifications Need Not Necessarily "Jump off the Page
and Slap You in the Face" to Be Evidence of Discrimination. U.S. Supreme Court
Holds That the 15-Employee Minimum under Title VII Is an Element of the
Plaintiff's Claim, but Does Not Impact a Federal Court's Jurisdiction
to Decide the Case. California Court of Appeal Rules: (1) Municipalities May Be Sued Directly for Damages Resulting from Deprivation of a Constitutional Right, If the Plaintiff Can Identify the Municipal Policy That Caused the Injury; but (2) Trial Court Must Reconsider Attorney Fee Award of $1.1 Million On Damage Award Of Only $30,300. California Employers May Be Sued for Violations of Civil Rights under Civil Code Sections 51.7 and 52.1, Which Technically Are Not Part of the Unruh Act. Employees' Optional Travel from Parking Lot to Job Site Is Not Compensable Time.
|
|
About our Firm | Our Services | Attorney Directory | Management Memos BRG&S Publications | Published Articles | BRG&S In the News | Seminars Visitor Comments | Home Page |
| Practice
limited to labor and employment law on behalf of management and related
litigation. Ballard Rosenberg Golper & Savitt, LLP has prepared this site
to enable you to learn more about our firm and the services it provides.
These materials do not, and are not intended to, constitute legal advice.
The information we make available at this site does not create an attorney-client
relationship, nor does it substitute for obtaining legal advice. ©2003 Ballard Rosenberg Golper & Savitt, LLP. No part of this site may be reproduced without permission. For technical support, contact webmaster. Site Design by Kricos Internet Design. |
