In a putative wage and hour class action against one of the firm’s well known hotel clients, in which they had previously obtained summary adjudication of Plaintiff’s meal and rest period penalty rate claim (see February 22, 2017 Verdicts/Favorable Outcomes), Richard Rosenberg and David Fishman obtained summary judgment with respect to Plaintiff’s remaining claims. Plaintiff’s remaining claims were premised on the assertion that the hotel’s rounding policy / practice violated California law because it did not compensate employees for all time worked. Plaintiff alleged that, due to the rounding policy, our client failed to pay employees at least minimum wage for all hours worked as well as derivative claims for failure to pay all wages upon termination, inaccurate wage statements, and unfair competition. The Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge in the Complex Division dismissed Plaintiff’s claims concluding that our client’s rounding policy complied with California law because it is both neutral on its face and in application and, as a result, will over a period of time, compensate the employees for all time they actually worked.

Ballard Rosenberg Golper & Savitt, LLP has prepared this site to enable you to learn more about our firm and the services it provides. These materials do not, and are not intended to, constitute legal advice. The information we make available at this site does not create an attorney-client relationship, nor does it substitute for obtaining legal advice. Nothing herein should be construed as a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter.

No portion of this site may be reproduced or used in any manner without the express written consent of Ballard Rosenberg Golper & Savitt LLP.