John Golper , Elsa Bañuelos, and John Manier successfully argued a motion for summary adjudication in San Bernardino Superior Court. The Firm’s client was sued by a former employee who was terminated for numerous violations of the company’s attendance policy. The plaintiff asserted claims for racial discrimination, wrongful termination, racial harassment, and failure to prevent discrimination and harassment, and requested punitive damages. Before the motion hearing, the court issued a tentative decision which would have allowed all of the plaintiff’s claims to go to trial.

However, after oral argument on January 16, 2019, the court reversed itself and granted the motion as to the claims for discrimination, wrongful termination, and punitive damages. The court ruled that the plaintiff failed to dispute his attendance violations, and found no evidence that he was terminated because of his race. After this ruling, all that remained in the case were the claims for harassment and failure to prevent harassment, which were based on only four alleged statements by one of the plaintiff’s

Ballard Rosenberg Golper & Savitt, LLP has prepared this site to enable you to learn more about our firm and the services it provides. These materials do not, and are not intended to, constitute legal advice. The information we make available at this site does not create an attorney-client relationship, nor does it substitute for obtaining legal advice. Nothing herein should be construed as a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter.

No portion of this site may be reproduced or used in any manner without the express written consent of Ballard Rosenberg Golper & Savitt LLP.